Maguindanao del Sur Representative Mohammad Tong Paglas has defended his decision to support the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte, stating that not all right decisions are popular, and not all popular decisions are right.
“It was a difficult decision, but I made this choice with the best interest of my constituents and the integrity of our institutions in mind,” Paglas explained. He admitted that abstaining would have been the politically safer route, especially in Mindanao, where Duterte enjoys significant support. However, he emphasized that his decision was based on principles rather than popularity.
“Why did I vote alongside 214 other lawmakers? Because I prioritized my duty to uphold the integrity of the institution, provide VP Sara the proper venue to explain the accusations against her, and ensure the long-term welfare of the people,” he added.
A Stand for Congressional Integrity
Paglas stressed that the impeachment process is a matter of upholding the Constitution, which mandates checks and balances between government branches.
“Congress has given VP Sara multiple chances to address the allegations against her, but instead of clarifying her side, she continuously ignored the House of Representatives’ inquiries. This is not just a lack of respect toward Congress but also to our Constitution, which ensures accountability in governance,” he argued.
The lawmaker reiterated that his vote for impeachment was a stand against the idea that any government official, regardless of position, is above accountability.
Impeachment as Due Process, Not a Personal Attack
Paglas was firm in stating that his support for impeachment was not a personal attack against Vice President Duterte. Rather, he viewed the impeachment trial as a legitimate process where Duterte could finally respond to allegations that she has previously evaded.
“If there were no irregularities in her handling of public funds, then this process would clear her name once and for all. The impeachment trial is the best way for VP Sara to put these accusations to rest,” he said.
Long-Term Welfare Over Short-Term Popularity
Acknowledging the backlash he might face, Paglas maintained that his decision ensures continued government support for Maguindanao del Sur. He pointed out that government programs—from financial aid, medical and educational assistance, to livelihood projects—rely on the support and endorsement of Congress.
“For a long time, our province has been neglected. By aligning with the congressional majority, I am ensuring that my constituents continue to receive the support they desperately need,” he emphasized.
He also dismissed claims that lawmakers who endorsed the impeachment complaint received financial incentives, calling such rumors “fake news, nonsense, and outright lies.”
“This is a selfless act on my part. I will be criticized, bashed, and possibly even abandoned by some, but if it means defending the integrity of our democratic institutions, ensuring due process for VP Sara, and securing continued government assistance for my people, then I stand by my decision. In the long run, we will realize that this was the right choice,” Paglas concluded.